Life as we know it in America and indeed across the globe is in the midst of massive change. When this incubus is over, how will life in the United States change and will those changes serve as a silver lining to the trauma we will have suffered as a nation, or will politicians seize the opportunity to become even more entrenched in their agendas?
Here are some of the challenges and opportunities that we may face in the coming months and years as illuminated in a Washington Post article, which you can read here followed by some of my commentary.
Please feel free to join the conversation in the Comments section below this article.
_____________________________________
More workers telecommute, reducing traffic and carbon emissions dramatically.
Carbon emissions in China (the world's 2nd largest economy), have already fallen by 25%. In the U.S., carbon monoxide emissions have plummeted by 50%. But a complete picture has not yet come into view about whether changing habits such as greater energy use in homes and the sudden rise in the number of delivery vehicles may offset some of the gains in air quality that were made by taking so many cars of the road. Needless to say, there will be lessons to be learned and much data to analyze in the future, which could lead to greater success in the fight against global climate change.
Having fewer workers in offices means a surplus of commercial real estate that might be available for conversion to residential use, expanding the housing stock
Is is possible that inner city buildings, now reserved for high rent office space could be converted into temporary or permanent shelter for homeless or low-income persons? Maybe some could be acquired by city governments, torn down all together and converted to green space or urban forests, scrubbing city air of pollutants and increasing localized oxygen levels. Certainly, with potentially fewer people commuting to work parking issues, traffic jams, pedestrian deaths and all the other challenges raised by vehicle over-crowding would be diminished.
Colleges and universities expand their student bodies as distance learning becomes commonplace. College is accessible to more people, and college costs drop. The on-campus college experience is transformed or eliminated altogether.
While distance learning opportunities serve us well in the short term, to deal with a crisis like the one we're facing now, the exponential benefits of the "college experience", the social connections, the multiple cultural and philosophical perspectives that are brought to bear in the classroom, would give way to students sitting alone, at home, staring at a screen all day. The inevitable transformation of the educational experience will have to be thoughtfully managed to accentuate the positives and minimize the negatives.
To say nothing about the fact that so much data coursing over our networks could very well drain bandwidth from our patchwork system of computer service providers. Would 5G arrive in time and save us from a collapse of our internet infrastructure, or would its rollout be delayed as we discover we'll need to beef up the systems we have?
SAT testing (requiring dozens, if not hundreds, of students to congregate) is suspended — and potentially discredited, as colleges learn they can select students without the test.
Frankly, I don't think anyone will lament the death of the SAT. Especially if a more streamlined and fair college entrance system is devised.
Everyone can vote by mail, defeating at least some voter suppression techniques.
Voting by mail, while decidedly analog and so 20th Century would indeed have one immediate benefit.. the elimination of potential interference in our voting systems by rogue governments and hackers. Is it possible that we will rediscover the benefits of pen and paper as a means of performing our civic duties and communicating with family, friends and colleagues?
Paid sick leave becomes the norm as employers recognize it is better for workers to stay home when they are ill.
Sure, there will always be those who take advantage of the system and play hooky on a warm, Summer day. But by in large, we all benefit when legitimately sick people stay at home. Maybe one solution would be for a sick person to teleconference with their doctor to confirm they are indeed ill and have a physician's excuse sent directly to the employer. That would save unnecessary trips to the doctor, reduce the spread of germs and allow the sick to stay home, where they belong.
Universal health care — not just coverage — becomes the focus. Telemedicine becomes widespread. We focus on expansion of local clinics and health-care entities (e.g. fever clinics).
Ah, and there're the rub. Will this crisis cause a surge in those supporting Bernie Sanders or at least his ideas of a Universal Health System? As he correctly pointed out in one of his stump speeches recently: We are paying more than any other industrialized country for our healthcare system, and when we really need it, we find it woefully underprepared to handle a crisis. Maybe it is time to follow the lead of countries that faired better under the strain of this pandemic. Yes, the term "Socialized Medicine" is anathema to small government minded conservatives, so maybe we just need to call it something innocuous allowing them to save face as they begrudgingly admit a defeat of their market driven ideology. Some things are handled better through a centralized or Federal system and Heath Care may indeed be one of those things.
Facts do matter. As the gap between reality and right-wing propaganda widens, the latter loses its iron grip on millions of voters.
Will Trump supporters finally admit that arrogance and pigheadedness can actually lead to weakness? As our leader has struggled to downplay the severity of this epidemic, presumably to avoid or reverse the inevitable impact to his signature accomplishments, (record low unemployment and a surging stock market), experts have had to explain away his erratic pronouncements or in some cases, publicly refute them as dangerous and short-sighted. Will this debacle come to define his entire tenure in office? Or will Trump's base choose to view his distrust of academics and intellectuals as tough-minded? Reason would seem to suggest that facts and science will need to play a much more prominent role in public policy going forward.
We begin to relocate parts of our supply chains to the United States, as safety takes priority over reduced labor costs.
One of the glaring liabilities in our current dependence on China and other providers of low cost goods and services is that when the entire globe is under threat, we have no Plan B. In industry, commerce and government, there has been a concerted effort to follow what has become known as "Lean" practices. Reducing inventory, unused space, extra capacity, etc., presuming that when we need it, we'll just requisition it. But when our supplier suddenly is unwilling or unable to fulfill our order, we become extremely vulnerable. Ironically, those very suppliers, such as South Korea and Japan saw the writing on the wall some time ago, when they dealt with their own, more localized epidemics. The lessons they learned inspired them to stockpile equipment and supplies for what they considered to be an inevitable dejavu moment. And that has been the primary reason they were able to rollout wide-spread testing almost immediately.
The challenge will be to reinforce our own infrastructure and bring back a strong manufacturing culture to the United States, while not giving in to isolationist sentiments. Perhaps a hybrid policy featuring Self-Reliance as well as Interdependence as coequal goals could put us in a better position for what we should now accept as a cyclical challenge.
-Shane Eric Mathias
To receive free notifications of new content on The Happiness Tree, please send an email to The Happiness Tree
Copy and paste "SIGN ME UP" into the subject line.
Thank you!